Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 23 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller, but higher. Ford C-Max is 45 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1680 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 57 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |