Ford C-Max 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 432 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1696 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 52 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Verso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |