Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max 2010 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford C-Max 2014, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford C-Max 2014. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max 2010 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2010 and Ford C-Max 2014 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2010 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max 2014. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max 2014 is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |