Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 42 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |