Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2010

 
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2014
Ford S-Max
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP140 HP
Torque: 300 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Ford C-Max engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1340 km on highway
900 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ...  More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.77 m
Width: 1.83 m1.88 m
Height: 1.63 m1.66 m
Ford C-Max is smaller.
Ford C-Max is 39 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 432 litres285 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data285 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 432 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1684 litres2000 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0502`505
Safety:
Quality:
average

low
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52006800
Rating in user reviews: 6.8/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford S-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv