Ford C-Max 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 242 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |