Ford C-Max 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Verso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 178 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 432 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1696 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 52 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Verso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |