Ford C-Max 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Verso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Toyota Verso has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 52 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |