Ford C-Max 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 4 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`944 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |