Ford C-Max 2010 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 5 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford C-Max is 10 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |