Ford C-Max 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 3 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1684 litres | 1734 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 68 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Picasso (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`915 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`489 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 561 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |