Ford C-Max 2010 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford C-Max has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |