Ford C-Max 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.86 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 3200 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 128 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Caddy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |