Ford C-Max 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.86 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 3200 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 128 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Caddy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |