Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014

 
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2015
Ford C-Max
2014 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP115 HP
Torque: 230 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds11.3 seconds
Ford C-Max 2014 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford C-Max 2010 engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford C-Max 2014, but torque is 15 NM more than Ford C-Max 2014. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.8 l/100km
By specification Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max 2010 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1370 km on highway
890 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.38 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.63 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2010 and Ford C-Max 2014 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1684 litres1684 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2010 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max 2014.
Gross weight: 1`915 kg1`915 kg
Net weight:1`390 kg1`390 kg
Load capacity:525 kg525 kg
Safety:
Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max 2014 is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 46006200
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv