Ford C-Max 2010 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford C-Max is 10 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |