Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine: The engine boasts a simple and reliable design.
After 100,000 km, piston knocking is a common issue. Electromagnetic Ti-VCT valves often develop leaks, and high-voltage wires frequently disconnect. The engine ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 124 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |