Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 159 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max 2010 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford C-Max 2014, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max 2010 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max 2010 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max 2010 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2014. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine: The engine boasts a simple and reliable design.
After 100,000 km, piston knocking is a common issue. Electromagnetic Ti-VCT valves often develop leaks, and high-voltage wires frequently disconnect. The engine ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2010 and Ford C-Max 2014 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1684 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2010 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max 2014. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`860 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`374 kg | 1`374 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 486 kg | 486 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max 2014 is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |