Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford B-Max 2012

 
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2014
Ford B-Max
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 150 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds12.1 seconds
Ford C-Max and Ford B-Max have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway940 km on highway
730 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.08 m
Width: 1.83 m1.75 m
Height: 1.63 m1.60 m
Ford C-Max is larger.
Ford C-Max is 30 cm longer than the Ford B-Max, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres318 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1684 litres1386 litres
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity.
Ford C-Max has 114 litres more trunk space than the Ford B-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 298 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford B-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8601`830
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Ford C-Max has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford B-Max, so Ford C-Max quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 54007600
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv