Ford C-Max 2014 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 45 HP more power than Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 1 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford C-Max has 270 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`973 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Scenic scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Scenic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |