Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 18 HP less power than Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 39 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |