Ford C-Max 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 9 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 5.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 145 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 369 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 2`178 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |