Ford C-Max 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Ford C-Max 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max 2007. On average, Ford C-Max 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2007. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2003 and Ford C-Max 2007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`958 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 5.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
| |