Ford C-Max 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 3 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 113 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 1`973 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
| |