Ford C-Max 2007 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 145 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 320 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.1 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford C-Max is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |