Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 163 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 340 NM | 159 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | 7.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.6 | 5.3 - 7.9 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller, but higher. Ford C-Max is 45 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1680 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 57 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 2`238 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |