Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 163 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 340 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.6 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 42 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |