Ford C-Max 2010 vs Ford B-Max 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 163 HP | 75 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 340 NM | 125 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | 11.2 - 15.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.6 | 3.8 - 6.4 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford B-Max. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 30 cm longer than the Ford B-Max, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 318 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1386 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford C-Max has 114 litres more trunk space than the Ford B-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 298 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford B-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 1`779 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford B-Max has
| |