Ford C-Max 2014 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 185 HP | 86 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 400 NM | 160 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.5 | 3.6 - 5.5 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford C-Max has 44 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | ~ 1`896 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |