Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford C-Max is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Kuga can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Ford C-Max is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 185 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Kuga are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford C-Max. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.5 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Ford C-Max petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Ford C-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1684 litres | 1653 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`949 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`438 kg | ~ 1`670 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 511 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |