Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 185 HP | 95 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 - 400 NM | 150 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.5 | 4.6 - 6.6 | |
|
On average, the Ford C-Max 2014 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford C-Max 2010. On average, Ford C-Max 2014 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2014 and Ford C-Max 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max 2014 has more luggage capacity. Ford C-Max 2014 has 112 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2014 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | ~ 1`950 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |