Ford B-Max 2012 vs Mini Countryman 2010

 
Ford B-Max
2012 - 2017
Mini Countryman
2010 - 2014
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 105 HP122 HP
Torque: 150 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds11.6 seconds
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving.
Ford B-Max engine produces 17 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Ford B-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.0 l/100km
By specification Ford B-Max consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Ford B-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford B-Max consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway780 km on highway
550 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford B-Max engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max, Ford FiestaUsed also on Mini Cooper
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford B-Max might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m4.10 m
Width: 1.75 m1.79 m
Height: 1.60 m1.56 m
Ford B-Max is smaller, but higher.
Ford B-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 318 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1386 litres1170 litres
Ford B-Max has 32 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford B-Max (by 216 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Ford B-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`765
Safety:
Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Mini Countryman has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford B-Max has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 76008600
Pros and Cons: Ford B-Max has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Mini Countryman has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv