Ford B-Max 2012 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Ford B-Max engine produces 9 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford B-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford B-Max consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Ford B-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford B-Max consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford B-Max is smaller. Ford B-Max is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Ford B-Max has 342 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Ford B-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Ford B-Max, so Ford B-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |