Ford B-Max 2012 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 18 seconds | |
| Ford B-Max engine produces 27 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Citroen Nemo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford B-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford B-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that by driving the Ford B-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford B-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford B-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.72 m | |
| Ford B-Max is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Nemo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford B-Max has 42 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. This could mean that the Ford B-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Ford B-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford B-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |