Ford B-Max 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a more dynamic driving. Ford B-Max engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, but torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Despite the higher power, Ford B-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford B-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that by driving the Ford B-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford B-Max consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford B-Max is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford B-Max is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Ford B-Max has 182 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means Ford B-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford B-Max has serious deffects in 455 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |