Ford B-Max 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 120 HP | 86 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 215 NM | 160 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15.1 seconds | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 5.5 | |
|
Ford B-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. On average, Ford B-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford B-Max is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford B-Max is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Ford B-Max has 182 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means Ford B-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`896 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |