Ford B-Max 2012 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 120 HP | 95 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 215 NM | 150 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15.1 seconds | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.4 | 4.6 - 6.6 | |
|
Ford B-Max petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford B-Max equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford B-Max is smaller. Ford B-Max is 30 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford B-Max is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 318 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1386 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Ford B-Max has 114 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 298 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford B-Max is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford B-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`950 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford B-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |