Fiat Ulysse 2002 vs Volvo V40 2016
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Ulysse engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite the higher power, Fiat Ulysse reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 5.4 | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Ulysse consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Ulysse could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.44 m | |
Fiat Ulysse is larger. Fiat Ulysse is 38 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Ulysse is 31 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 324 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2948 litres | 1500 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Fiat Ulysse has 11 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Fiat Ulysse uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Ulysse (by 1448 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Ulysse is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 1`965 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Ulysse has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |