Fiat Tipo 2020 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Fiat Tipo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 449 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1432 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Tipo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`944 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`310 kg | 1`289 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 655 kg | |
| Fiat Tipo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |