Fiat Tipo 2016 vs Renault Megane 2018
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 65 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Tipo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Fiat Tipo is 17 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 113 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`814 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |