Fiat Tipo 2016 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 27 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 13 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Tipo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Tipo has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |