Fiat Tipo 2016 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Tipo engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Megane, but torque is 20 NM less than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Tipo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Fiat Tipo is 17 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 136 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Tipo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`841 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |