Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Tipo and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, but Fiat Tipo torque is 40 NM more than Volvo V40. Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Fiat Tipo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1470 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1610 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Tipo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Tipo is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 215 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |