Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 57 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Tipo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Fiat Tipo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Tipo is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 226 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`755 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |