Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Tipo engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Thanks to more power Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Tipo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Tipo is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1395 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Pulsar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Fiat Tipo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`795 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`270 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |