Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Pulsar. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Tipo is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1395 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Tipo has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. The Nissan Pulsar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Fiat Tipo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |