Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Tipo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Tipo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |