Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Renault Megane 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 65 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Fiat Tipo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Fiat Tipo and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`695 kg | 1`814 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`195 kg | 1`254 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 560 kg | |
| Fiat Tipo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |