Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Tipo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1263 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`695 kg | 1`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`195 kg | 1`185 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 615 kg | |
| Fiat Tipo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |