Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Tipo engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Nissan Pulsar. Due to the lower power, Fiat Tipo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Tipo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Tipo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Tipo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Tipo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Tipo is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Tipo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1395 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Tipo has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. The Nissan Pulsar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Fiat Tipo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |