Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Renault Megane 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 120 HP | 90 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 320 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.1 seconds | 5.7 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 6.3 | 3.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Fiat Tipo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Fiat Tipo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Fiat Tipo and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Tipo has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Tipo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`786 | ~ 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |